|
(not in stock now)
VADLYD MD12 MK4 includes as standard vertical/lateral switch, and switchable inputs for MM/MC cartridges. MC inputs are with 3 switchable load impedances: 50, 100, and 200 ohms.
Recording engineers and serious
record collectors know the problem when playing early
phonograph records: ordinary RIAA phono equalization does
not always match the original recording equalization that
was used to make the record.
78rpm records in particular have many different eq settings depending on period, placement, and recording company. Even within the same company, there may be differences depending on which engineer was on job that day.
Overview:
A few words concerning long life of all electronic
equipment: most potentiometers can stand severe wear for
decades, but dust - and especially smoke - can make them
noisy in a very short time. Tobacco smoke is ALMOST as
dangerous for a pot as it is for your health!
When playing phonograph records, you might normally use the
phono input provided on your amplifier, often called a RIAA
(Recording Industries Association in America) phono input.
The RIAA equalization curve specifies two turnover points (a
turnover point is where the level changes 3dB): one at
500Hz, and the other at 2125Hz. The RIAA playback curve has
the following theoretical response:
1. +17dB from 20Hz to 50Hz, then falling about 6dB/octave to
2. 0dB from 500Hz to 2125Hz, and then falling again about
6dB/octave to
3. -13.7dB at 10kHz.
You use the RIAA playback curve to compensate for the RIAA
equalization that was originally used to make the record.
Normally this works well on single, EP and LP records,
issued from 1955 and later. But with earlier LPs (some
record companies didnt use RIAA before 1960), this curve is
not correct. The cutting equalizations on all 78 RPMs and
LPs before 1955 have been very different. 78rpm records in
particular used curves very different from the RIAA curve.
For this reason, you should not use the RIAA phono input on
your amplifier if you want good quality reproduction of
78rpm records.
I want to thank Roger Wilmut for basic information about
reproduction of 78rpm records. For a better understanding of
the problems of reproduction of records, read the following
articles (with a few edits from my hand) taken with kind
permission from Roger Wilmuts home page: Reproduction of
78rpm records - www.rfwilmut.clara.net/repro78/repro.html.
EQUALIZATION OF PHONOGRAPH RECORDS
The simplest form of disk cutter consists of an amplifier,
similar to that used to drive a loudspeaker, connected to a
cutting head having a stylus connected to a coil, which is
placed in the field from a strong magnet (or, more usually
in later designs, a magnet within a coil). When the signal
is applied to the coil, the stylus moves and engraves a
groove in the blank disk. (There is of course a lot more to
it than that, but we are considering only the basics here.)
However, because the cutter heads movements translate the
amplitude swings of the original signal into velocity - the
rate at which the stylus moves during its swings -
low-frequency signals would be recorded with a much larger
swing than high-frequency signals of the same original
amplitude. In order to keep the movements of the groove much
the same at all frequencies (given equal level signals) it
is necessary to use a circuit to introduce - in the
theoretical situation - a 6 dB/octave cut as the frequency
decreases - i.e., halve the frequency and you halve the
voltage.
In the reverse situation, that of a reproduction head, the
principal is that of a wire moved in a magnetic field - it
is the rate of cutting lines of force that matters. The
cutter head works exactly in reverse, like a simple motor,
where increased voltage means increased speed. Therefore,
the constant amplitude groove theoretically achieved
produces a signal where the bass is low and the treble high:
so a 6 dB/octave cut with increasing frequency would be
called for.
In the real world, losses in the head with increased
frequency complicate the issue. Early cutter heads were
highly inefficient, and so, while the bass cut described
above was used, the treble trailed away, resulting in equal
groove modulations (movements) up to mid frequencies, but
decreasing above that.
To compensate for this, the playback characteristic boosted
the bass below 200 Hz but left it flat above that -
effectively providing a 6 dB/octave boost to the higher
frequencies (and the surface noise). With the later
improvements in cutters, it was possible to pack more treble
onto the records, and so new equalizations provided for a 6
dB/octave cut above a turnover frequency which varied
between 3.4 and about 6 kHz, depending on the system.
Similar techniques were applied to microgroove records, and
the final standard, RIAA, provides for a bass boost below
500 Hz and a treble cut above the lower frequency of 2,212
kHz - the latter reflecting the considerably increased
amount of treble which can be cut onto an LP.
Therefore playing a 78rpm record using RIAA equalization -
all that is available to many people - produces far less top
end response than is correct, particularly for the earliest
electrical records, where the result is akin to turning the
treble control down. (Turning the treble up gives an
improvement, but it doesnt touch the important mid-range.)
Use of the correct eq curves when reproducing 78rpm records
produces a startling improvement in the sound quality
(although admittedly the surface noise can increase).
Many of these older recordings are of surprisingly high
quality after all!
At the time the format disappeared as a popular format, the
recommended stylus size was 60 (0.0025) conical tip. This
would be satisfactory for records made in the final few
years, but for the great majority of the time since the
beginning of 78s in 1896 the grooves were much wider than
the standard, with the result that a 60 stylus skates about
in the bottom of the groove, seriously increasing the
surface noise.
The basic stylus is conical, with a spherical tip; the
included angle of the cone is 60 degrees. Most modern styli
are elliptical: i.e. they look the same from the front, but
from the side they have a much narrower angle. This enables
them to track movements in the groove more easily (as the
groove moves from side to side it effectively narrows - not
across its direct width but across the diameter of the
conical tip, at an angle to the direction of travel:
consequently a spherical tip will ride up in the groove).
The illustrations below could apply equally to a spherical
tip and an elliptical tip seen from the front: in practice I
would always recommend elliptical.
|
A modern record groove should be a neat 90 degrees, with the stylus making contact at only two points part-way up the groove wall, thus avoiding any debris in the bottom of the groove. (Some modern microgroove styli have a flat section at the contact point, giving a wider area of contact which reduces wear: however it can also increase noise from worn or damaged groove walls and I would be dubious about its use for 78s). |
However older 78s were cut to be used with steel needles, on the assumption that the needle would wear down to fit the groove in the first few seconds: when this wider groove is tracked with a 2.5 thou stylus the result is bottoming as can be seen here. |
|
|
Here the combination of a larger basic size: 70 (0.0028) works on the majority of records, although larger sizes may be helpful with very old records - and the truncated tip (which is spherical down to the contact points but truncated below) result in vastly better tracking. Like LPs, Records in good condition, will be better reproduced If the stylus is elliptical. This brings a considerable improvement in distortion and will be with reduced surface noise and greater analysis. With records in poor condition, you often will have a better reproduction with conical styli. |
Records from |
Conical truncated |
Eliptical truncated |
Before 1920: |
100 (0.0040") |
100 x 30 (0.0040" x 0.0012") |
1920 - 1939: |
90 (0.0035") |
90 x 30 (0.0035" x 0.0012") |
1939 - : |
70 (0.0028") |
70 x 25 (0.0028" x 0.0009") |
P.O. Box 3 - Ashtead
Surrey KT21 "QD - England
Tel: +44 01372 276604
Not all 78s were actually recorded at 78 rpm. Even in the
late 1920s, English Columbia was still using 80 rpm, and
prior to about 1921 speeds were widely variable. Speeds as
low as 68 or as high as 84 rpm are not uncommon.
To make matters worse, relatively few 78rpm records state
the speed (and when they do its not always accurate). If the
work is a classical piece such as an opera aria, it is
possible to check the correct pitch against a score or a
modern recording. However, as occasionally singers would
transpose, even this isn't completely reliable. My best
recommendation is to gradually reduce the speed of a record
until it starts to sound sluggish, and then increase it
slightly (in my experience the ear is much more sensitive to
low speeds than high speeds).
Finding a turntable capable of coping with these speeds is
often a challenge. I dont know of any normally available
turntable which has more than a tiny variation (usually 2 or
3 %), which is nowhere near enough); but electronically
controlled turntables may be modifiable. You need a speed
range of 72 to 82 to cover most records.
For further information, see Roger Wilmuts web site:
http://www.rfwilmut.clara.net/repro78/repro.html. This site
contains additional information about 78rpm records.
Coarse Groove (78 rpm)
SYSTEM |
Treble turnover |
Bass turnover |
Lower bass t/o |
Cut at 10 kHz |
Boost at 50 hz |
Flat |
flat |
flat |
|
|
|
US MID 30 |
flat |
400 Hz |
70 Hz |
- |
16 dB |
WESTREX |
flat |
200 Hz |
- |
- |
15 dB |
HMV |
flat |
250 Hz |
50 Hz |
- |
12 dB |
ffrr 1949 |
6.36 kHz |
250 Hz |
40 Hz |
5 dB |
12 dB |
Early DECCA |
5.8 kHz |
150 Hz |
- |
6 dB |
11 dB |
Columbia |
1.6 kHz |
300 Hz |
- |
16 dB |
14 dB |
BSI |
3.18 kHz |
353 Hz |
50 Hz |
10.5 dB |
14 dB |
Note that record companies used many different eq
settings, and sometimes the same company used different
settings depending on which recording engineer was on
job.
Generally, there is a difference between American and
European 78 rpm recordings: the American records were
normally much louder cut with much more bass response
and a higher bass turnover frequency. The two American
record companies Columbia and Victor had different
settings but both used basically the patent from Western
Electric.
Since theory and practice are not always the same,
always use your ears! This is especially true with
records in bad condition, which as a result of wear have
often lost much their high frequency response.
Unfortunately, many 78s are in bad condition because
they have been played many times.
Ideally, use FLAT for old acoustic recordings. Sometimes
you will find that you will get a better sound with a
little bass lift. Then try one of the other eq settings
and use the 80 Hz bass cut filter.
Next eq is US MID 30, which is useful for a lot of
American records. Normally you should use it together
with the variable low pass filter and find the right
settings. Good for American Victor.
Use WESTREX (English Western Electric) for HMV 78s with
a triangle matrix code and English Columbias with a W
Matrix code.
HMV eq is used for HMVs with a square matrix code, and
English Columbia with a C matrix code, or in both cases
with no code (post 1945 up to about 1953).
ffrr 1949 is used by Decca and EMI.
Early Decca are Decca eq setting from 30s.
Columbia is an American Columbia setting used by
Columbia since around 1930. But note: this setting is an
ideal setting and only useful for records in absolute
good condition
.
BSI 78 useful for all post 1953 78s. It can also be
useful for some earlier American 78s.
SYSTEM |
Treble turnover |
Bass turnover |
Lower bass t/o |
Cut at 10 kHz |
Boost at 50 hz |
ffrr LP 1953 |
3 kHz |
450 Hz |
100 Hz |
11 dB |
12.5 dB |
CCIR |
3.18 kHz |
500 Hz |
50 Hz |
10.5 dB |
17 dB |
NAB |
1.6 kHz |
500 Hz |
- |
16 dB |
16 dB |
RIAA | 2.1215 kHz | 500.5 Hz | 50.5 Hz | 13.6 dB | 17 dB |
CCIR is used by European labels for early LPs and EPs
.
Use NAB (NARTB) for some early American LPs. Use NAB
together with the first order 80 Hz bass cut filter for
American Columbia LPs.
RIAA is the universal standard (in theory) of all EP/LPs
after 1955
.
REPRODUCTION OF PATH AND EDISON VERTICAL CUT RECORDS
Normally mono recordings are lateral, which means side
to side in the groove wall. But some of the first
recordings were vertically cut, also named as hill and
dale recordings. Because of that, a mono cartridge is
not able to reproduce a vertical groove signal. But a
stereo record is a combination of a lateral cut and a
vertical cut record. Thats why you can use a stereo
cartridge. You will get the best result with a special
costum made stylus for this purpose.
Ask your Cartridge Man for purchasing the right stylus.
For reproduction of Path and Edison vertically cut
records, activate the VERTICAL switch.
Further references:
International Association of Sound and Audiovisual
Archives
http://www.iasa-web.org/
http://www.aes.org/
http://www.arsc-audio.org/
http://www.ebu.ch/en/index.php
http://www.archivists.org/
http://www2.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Foundation/Grants/
Power requirements:
Frequency response: 18 Hz to 54 kHz (-1 dB)
Input impedance: 47 kOhm/220 pF (MM), 50/100/200 Ohm
(MC)
Gain @ 1KHz: 50dB (MM), 75dB (MC)
Max out: +24 dBu
Output impedance (normal out) 50 Ohm
Load impedance (normal out): > 600 Ohm
Deviation from RIAA-curve: max. 0.5 dB
Distortion @ +10dBu out (20Hz-20KHz): 0.03%
Noise: -70dBA below 2.5mV in (MM), -70dBA below 1mV in
(MC)
Channel separation @ 10KHz: > 55dB
0 dBu = 0.775 V
Balanced XLRs: Pin 1 = ground, pin 2 = hot, pin 3 =
cold.